EDPB adopts statement on the implementation of the PNR directive
Brussels, 14 March - During its March 2025 plenary meeting, the European Data Protection Board (EDPB) adopted a statement on the implementation of the Passenger Name Record Directive (PNR) in light of the Court of Justice of the EU (CJEU) judgment C-817/19*.
In its second statement on the implementation of the PNR Directive, which follows the one of 15 December 2022, the Board gives further guidance to the Passenger Information Units (PIUs)** on the necessary adaptions and limitations to the processing of PNR data, following the PNR judgment. PNR data is personal information provided by passengers, and collected and held by air carriers that includes the names of the passengers, travel dates, itineraries, seats, baggage, contact details and means of payment.
The statement includes practical recommendations for the national laws transposing the PNR Directive in order to give effect to the findings of the CJEU in the PNR judgment. The recommendations cover some of the key aspects of the PNR judgement such as how European countries should select the flights from which PNR data is collected, or how long PNR data should be retained. According to the Board, the retention period of all PNR data should not exceed an initial period of six months. After this period, European countries may only store PNR data as long as needed and proportionate to the objectives of the PNR Directive.
EDPB Chair Anu Talus said: “The EDPB recognises the importance of the PNR Directive in improving the security of passengers across Europe and in helping prevent, detect and prosecute terrorist offences and serious crime. The transfer of PNR data in Europe should take place in a harmonised way and in full respect of data protection principles.”
The Board is aware that some European countries have already started the adaptation process, but there is still a substantial lack of implementation efforts throughout the Member States. Therefore, in its statement, the EDPB outlines the urgent need to implement the necessary changes and to amend national laws by taking into account the PNR judgment as soon as possible.
Note to editors
* On 21 June 2022, on a referral from the Belgian Constitutional Court, the CJEU rendered its judgment C-817/19 on the use of passenger name record (PNR) data for the prevention, detection, investigation and prosecution of terrorist offences and serious crime, under the PNR Directive 2016/681. While the Court found that the validity of the PNR Directive was not affected, it ruled that, in order to ensure compliance with the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights (the Charter), the PNR Directive needs to be interpreted as including important limitations to the processing of personal data. Some of these limitations are the application of the PNR system only to terrorist offences and serious crime, having an objective link with the carriage of passengers by air, and the non-indiscriminate application of the general retention period of five years to all passengers’ personal data.
** The PIUs are specific entities in European countries which are responsible for the collection, storage, and processing of PNR data.